Your Kotlin tests, reviewed against the code they claim to protect
Paste your Kotlin source files, the tests that cover them — Kotest, JUnit or both — and
build.gradle.kts if you have it. You get a verdict, a check-by-check table, the
findings that matter with a corrected fragment each, a ready-to-paste suggested spec, and the
Gradle commands to prove the fix worked.
Both examples ship with a saved model run, so you can see the whole review — including the suggested spec — without signing in and without spending a credit.
What this does, and what it does not
The prescan is real parsing, not a keyword search. Test bodies are extracted by brace matching
— with strings and comments skipped — so a test that asserts nothing is found by reading its
actual body, not by keyword proximity; mock declarations are read argument by argument, so
relaxed = true on a logger and on a payment service are counted the same way but
judged differently by the review; and suspend functions declared in your source are matched
against every every { } block, so a stub that needed
coEvery is caught mechanically. A delay(…) inside
runTest runs on virtual time and is correctly left alone, while
Thread.sleep in the same file is flagged. Everything the prescan finds is handed
to the model as facts it must reconcile, and the review is checked against them afterwards —
if the model skips a flag, this page says so.
It reads; it does not compile or run anything, and it never reaches your repository. This is a
review of the text you pasted, not a substitute for ./gradlew test — which is the
command every review here ends with. The suggested spec is checked in your browser for
identifiers that never appear in your paste, so an invented class name is called out before
you try to compile it.
Nothing to hand? Load the , a coroutine-heavy suite with sleeps, relaxed mocks and a disabled test, or the , which is mostly right and wants confirmation plus a property-testing nudge. Both replay a saved run for free.